Key points
- Title VI is a statute; an executive order cannot repeal it. Recipients of federal funds remain covered.
- Health programs have the most specific duties, under the Section 1557 rule at 45 CFR Part 92.
- EO 14224 expressly does not require agencies to stop offering services in other languages.
- State laws, grant terms, contracts, and accreditation standards often require language access regardless of federal policy.
- A documented program, with a plan, qualified interpreters, translated vital documents, and records, is the strongest position.
Ready for a review? See our Language access compliance audits.
Language access compliance means giving people with limited English proficiency (LEP) meaningful access to your programs and services. Federal rules changed in 2025: Executive Order 14224 revoked Executive Order 13166, and the Department of Justice withdrew its earlier LEP guidance. But the core obligations did not disappear. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act still applies to every recipient of federal funds, the language access rules under Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act remain in force for health programs, the ADA still requires effective communication, and state and local language access laws keep expanding.
What changed in 2025
- Executive Order 14224 (March 1, 2025) designated English as the official language of the United States and revoked Executive Order 13166, which since 2000 had directed federal agencies to improve access for people with LEP. The order states that agencies are not required to stop producing documents or offering services in other languages.
- The Attorney General’s July 2025 memo implementing the order withdrew DOJ’s earlier LEP guidance to federal fund recipients, and several other agencies have withdrawn or are revising their own guidance.
- Executive Order 14281 (April 2025) directed federal agencies to deprioritize enforcement based on disparate-impact theories, which had supported much of the federal LEP enforcement.
The practical effect: less detailed federal guidance and a different federal enforcement posture. The underlying laws below did not change.
What still applies
| Source | Who it covers | What it requires |
|---|---|---|
| Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 2000d) | Any organization that receives federal financial assistance: state and local agencies, schools, hospitals, courts, and nonprofits with federal grants | No discrimination based on national origin. The Supreme Court applied Title VI in Lau v. Nichols (1974) to require schools to address the language needs of students who did not speak English. |
| Section 1557 of the ACA (45 CFR Part 92) | Health programs that receive HHS funding, HHS programs, and ACA marketplaces | Qualified interpreters and translators, notices of free language help in the state’s top 15 LEP languages, human review of machine-translated critical content, and written procedures |
| Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 | State and local governments, public accommodations, and federally funded programs | Effective communication for Deaf and hard-of-hearing people, including qualified sign language interpreters and captioning |
| Court Interpreters Act (28 U.S.C. 1827) and state court rules | Federal and state courts | Certified or qualified interpreters in proceedings |
| State and local laws | State agencies and, in some states, local governments, health plans, and providers | Varies: for example, California’s Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual Services Act and New York’s statewide language access law, which requires state agencies to translate vital documents into the 12 most common non-English languages in the state |
| Grants, contracts, and accreditation | Grantees, contractors, and accredited organizations | Language access terms written into the award, the contract, or the accreditation standard |
For health programs, HHS confirmed in a June 2026 Federal Register notice that a court order vacating parts of the 2024 Section 1557 rule related to gender identity left the rule’s other provisions, including language access, in force.
The risk of scaling back
Some organizations are asking whether they can cut language services. Before you do, weigh what still applies:
- Health programs have binding regulations, not just guidance. Section 1557 can be enforced by HHS, and individuals can sue under Section 1557.
- Intentional discrimination remains actionable under Title VI. A policy of refusing service to people who do not speak English carries more risk than a policy of providing it.
- State laws and attorneys general are increasingly active where federal enforcement has pulled back.
- Safety and liability do not depend on any executive order. A misunderstood consent form, discharge instruction, or safety warning is a malpractice, workplace safety, or due process problem.
- Federal policy can change again. Rebuilding a dismantled program costs more than maintaining one.
The elements of a defensible language access program
- Know your population. Use your own service data and Census American Community Survey data to identify the languages your community speaks.
- Write a language access plan. Document which services you provide, in which languages, how staff get an interpreter, and who is responsible.
- Use qualified interpreters. Do not rely on family members, children, or untested bilingual staff.
- Translate vital documents. Applications, consent forms, notices of rights, and anything that requires a response, in the languages your community speaks.
- Tell people help is free. Post notices in your top languages, on your website and at every point of contact.
- Train staff. Every front-line employee should know how to identify a language need and reach an interpreter on every shift.
- Keep records. Log every request and every encounter, so you can prove what you provided.
- Review the program. Check usage, complaints, and community data at least once a year, and update the plan as the rules change.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Title VI language access still required after Executive Order 14224?
Title VI is a law passed by Congress, and an executive order cannot repeal it. Recipients of federal funds are still prohibited from discriminating based on national origin. What changed is federal guidance and enforcement priorities, not the statute.
Was Executive Order 13166 revoked?
Yes. Executive Order 14224, signed March 1, 2025, revoked Executive Order 13166. EO 14224 also states that agencies are not required to stop offering documents or services in languages other than English.
Do hospitals still need interpreters under Section 1557?
Yes. The language access provisions of the 2024 Section 1557 rule, including qualified interpreters and translators and notices of language assistance, remain in force. A 2025 court order vacated only certain provisions related to gender identity.
What is a language access plan?
A written document describing the languages your community speaks, the services you provide, how staff reach interpreters and translations, how you notify people that help is free, how you train staff, and how you monitor the program. It is the first document an investigator or surveyor asks for.
Which documents count as vital documents?
Documents that affect a person’s access to services, rights, or obligations: applications, consent forms, notices of rights, eligibility and benefit notices, complaint forms, and anything that requires a response. The more important the document, the stronger the case for translating it.
Do state language access laws still apply?
Yes. Federal executive orders do not override state laws. California, New York, and many other states and cities have their own language access requirements for agencies, and some for health plans and providers.
This guide is general information as of October 2026, not legal advice. Federal policy in this area is changing; confirm your obligations with counsel.
